
Sorry Some games were made compatible through the introduction of some patches. I wanted to write an explanation for you, but then I felt that it sounded pathetic and I didnt have a good reason, other than not feeling like getting too involved. This was a reason why I could not quite help you with writing the release notes. Since I started to distance myself from this project, I havent actually made too many changes to it. Would there be a willingness to redirect the repository to a new organizationaccount, and future changes would be made there (A good candidate for this would be the ps2homebrew organization).Īnd yes, i know that there is the polish and bulgarian translations, dont worry, we are not in hurry, thank you. He never responded to my e-mail from two years ago about Travis CI. I dont remember other, it was long time since I recently used OPL, so for me there is no rush. There was also a problem when mode 6 was enabled, MODES 78 after Saving Changes was also enabled.
#OPEN PS2 LOADER 0.9.4 FREE#
The languages are not complete, but this can always be updated in the repository and is no reason to wait any longer for the publication of a new version, and honestly i dont have much free time. I know this could confuse users because the latest versions were all correlative in their numbering, (0.9.0, 0.9.2, 0.9.3), but the changes are much larger and more important now than in all those latest versions together.


Or why not call it directly v1.0 The changes in the core are very large since OPL 0.9.3, and realistically i doubt that in the future there will be as many changes at the core level as there have been from 0.9.3 to the current beta revision.Īnd if new versions of the OPL were published in the future, they could be called v1.1, v1.2, etc. It has been a long time since the OPL 0.9.3 was published, many changes were made, and very important since then.įor this reason i believe that the new version could have a numbering beyond 0.9.4, it could be called 0.9.6, 0.9.7, 0.9.8 etc. I think this thread is to get an up to date change log yea I think again sp193 would be the obvious candidate since afaik no one else knows all the core changes. Imo before this can happen, the readme change log need to be updated.
